Vasima Ismail Jalgaonkar-2 vs Harbansalal Gyanchand Kukareja Advocate - jitekar S. S. — 71/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 34. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG080010852019
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
146/2019
Filing Date
24-09-2019
Registration No
71/2019
Registration Date
24-09-2019
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KHALAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vasima Ismail Jalgaonkar-2
Adv. Bhusaree I.A.
Mumtaj rashid Jalgaonkar
Shabira Abudl Kadir Lambate
Respondent(s)
Harbansalal Gyanchand Kukareja Advocate - jitekar S. S.
Yunus Mahamdsale Bedekar
Abul Latif Mahamadsale Bedekar
Hasan Mahamdsale Bedekar
Jainab Abbas Mukari
Hasina Abdul Rajjak Dhanase
Jubeda Irfan Mulla
Abida Abdul Rahiman Dhanase
Mariyam Yunus Bedekar
Ikbal Abdulla Bedekar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KHALAPUR
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-11-2025 | Hearing | |
| 27-10-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the petitions (Notices 58 and 60) and set aside the abatement order. The court condoned the delay in filing the application to substitute the legal representative of Defendant No. 1 (who died on 19/09/2021), finding that the plaintiffs' delay in filing the substitution application was not entirely inexplicable, and ordered the legal representative to be brought on record. A cost of Rs. 1,000 was imposed on the plaintiffs and directed to be deposited with the Legal Services Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the petitions (Notices 58 and 60) and set aside the abatement order. The court condoned the delay in filing the application to substitute the legal representative of Defendant No. 1 (who died on 19/09/2021), finding that the plaintiffs' delay in filing the substitution application was not entirely inexplicable, and ordered the legal representative to be brought on record. A cost of Rs. 1,000 was imposed on the plaintiffs and directed to be deposited with the Legal Services Authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts