Vaman Sakharam Rasal other 4 vs Shantaram Kashinath Pingle other 3 Advocate - urankar — 82/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG080010042016
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
159/2016
Filing Date
06-10-2016
Registration No
82/2016
Registration Date
06-10-2016
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vaman Sakharam Rasal other 4
Adv. Pawar S.S.
Smt Bababai Anant Patil
Adv. Pawar S.S.
Shri Krushna Khandu Rasal
Adv. Pawar S.S.
Shri Vasant Khandu Rasal
Adv. Pawar S.S.
Shri Ganesh Khandu Rasal
Adv. Pawar S.S.
Respondent(s)
Shantaram Kashinath Pingle other 3 Advocate - urankar
Harishndra Govind Pingle
Sandeep Shantaram Pingle
Shri Ashok Gopal Pingle
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 27-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 09-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready | |
| 18-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application filed under Section 151 CPC by the plaintiff to file a rough sketch map (initially missing from an encroachment removal suit) is allowed. The court held that the defect is curable and not fatal to the suit, citing Supreme Court precedent that trial courts should permit correction of such formal defects to ensure complete justice. However, the plaintiff is ordered to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the defendant as compensation for the default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application filed under Section 151 CPC by the plaintiff to file a rough sketch map (initially missing from an encroachment removal suit) is allowed. The court held that the defect is curable and not fatal to the suit, citing Supreme Court precedent that trial courts should permit correction of such formal defects to ensure complete justice. However, the plaintiff is ordered to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the defendant as compensation for the default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts