State of maharashtra vs Rajendra Dagadu Jadhav Advocate - Gupta A.D. — 418/2019
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e,98. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG080008532019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
728/2019
Filing Date
30-07-2019
Registration No
418/2019
Registration Date
30-07-2019
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KHALAPUR
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Dagadu Jadhav Advocate - Gupta A.D.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KHALAPUR
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 04-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 06-11-2025 | Hearing | |
| 14-10-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged accused Rajendra Dagadu Jadhav in a Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act case by stopping proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The discharge was ordered due to the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite repeated summons, constituting inordinate delay that rendered the proceedings oppressive and unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged accused Rajendra Dagadu Jadhav in a Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act case by stopping proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The discharge was ordered due to the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite repeated summons, constituting inordinate delay that rendered the proceedings oppressive and unwarranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts