State of Maharashtra vs Geeta Dattatreya Gaikwad — 528/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 E. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG080008322025
Next Hearing
30th May 2026
Filing Number
711/2025
Filing Date
16-05-2025
Registration No
528/2025
Registration Date
16-05-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
Khalapur Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Geeta Dattatreya Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 06-12-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Geeta Dattatreya Gaikwad (528/2025) In this case heard at Khalapur Court on 12/03/2026, two government witnesses testified regarding the seizure of 20 plastic bottles of country liquor from accused Geeta Gaikwad on 26/04/2025. Both witnesses later retracted their testimonies, denying they witnessed the seizure or signed the panchnama (seizure document). The court allowed leading questions under Indian Evidence Act Section 154 due to witness inconsistencies. The defense counsel rejected the testimonies. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Geeta Dattatreya Gaikwad (528/2025) In this case heard at Khalapur Court on 12/03/2026, two government witnesses testified regarding the seizure of 20 plastic bottles of country liquor from accused Geeta Gaikwad on 26/04/2025. Both witnesses later retracted their testimonies, denying they witnessed the seizure or signed the panchnama (seizure document). The court allowed leading questions under Indian Evidence Act Section 154 due to witness inconsistencies. The defense counsel rejected the testimonies. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts