State of Maharashtra vs Husen Shabbir Kachvala — 367/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304(A),279,337,338. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG080006292023
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
531/2023
Filing Date
04-05-2023
Registration No
367/2023
Registration Date
04-05-2023
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
FIR Details
FIR Number
147
Police Station
Khopoli Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Husen Shabbir Kachvala
Hearing History
Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 17-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Husen Shabbir Kachvala (367/2023) This case involves testimony from a government witness (IRB road patrolman Suresh Vishwanath Kadam) regarding a hit-and-run accident on the Mumbai-Pune Expressway on April 16, 2023, where a pedestrian (Chandrakant Taralekr) was struck by an SUV driven by accused Husen Shabbir Kachvala. The witness identified the accused at the accident scene and testified that the victim was transported to hospital. The court accepted the witness's testimony and closed arguments without ordering further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Husen Shabbir Kachvala (367/2023) This case involves testimony from a government witness (IRB road patrolman Suresh Vishwanath Kadam) regarding a hit-and-run accident on the Mumbai-Pune Expressway on April 16, 2023, where a pedestrian (Chandrakant Taralekr) was struck by an SUV driven by accused Husen Shabbir Kachvala. The witness identified the accused at the accident scene and testified that the victim was transported to hospital. The court accepted the witness's testimony and closed arguments without ordering further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts