Shevanta Hiru Patade vs Keshav Rama Nikam Advocate - Bhusaree A.A. — 41/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG080004742019
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
79/2019
Filing Date
30-04-2019
Registration No
41/2019
Registration Date
30-04-2019
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KHALAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shevanta Hiru Patade
Adv. S.V. Mhatre
Respondent(s)
Keshav Rama Nikam Advocate - Bhusaree A.A.
Baliram Keshav Nikam
Hanumant Dagadu Patil
Datta Balu Shelar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KHALAPUR
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 03-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 20-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 22-12-2025 | Hearing | |
| 17-11-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition is dismissed (Muddey Kr. 1 to 3: "Ashsat: Hokaraathi"). The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove she holds sole ownership rights to the disputed property (estate of deceased Rama Navaji Nikam). The court ruled that Respondent 1, having proven his claim as an heir through valid succession documentation dating back to 1955, has legitimate rights over the property, thereby rejecting the plaintiff's claims for exclusive possession, partition, or removal of the respondent's name from property records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition is dismissed (Muddey Kr. 1 to 3: "Ashsat: Hokaraathi"). The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove she holds sole ownership rights to the disputed property (estate of deceased Rama Navaji Nikam). The court ruled that Respondent 1, having proven his claim as an heir through valid succession documentation dating back to 1955, has legitimate rights over the property, thereby rejecting the plaintiff's claims for exclusive possession, partition, or removal of the respondent's name from property records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts