Sunita Vaman Gaikwad vs Khalapur Police Station — 20/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG080002232026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

190/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar

Judge

1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunita Vaman Gaikwad

    Adv. Sarita pundalik waghmare

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Khalapur Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court allowed the application under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure and ordered the return of 0.470 milligrams of gold jewelry (valued at Rs. 5,858) to the applicant, Sunita Vaman Gayakwad, who had proven ownership through purchase bills and other documentary evidence. The court rejected the police's argument that the seized article could be modified or sold, finding that the applicant's right to the property was established and that prolonged detention in the police station served no purpose pending trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure and ordered the return of 0.470 milligrams of gold jewelry (valued at Rs. 5,858) to the applicant, Sunita Vaman Gayakwad, who had proven ownership through purchase bills and other documentary evidence. The court rejected the police's argument that the seized article could be modified or sold, finding that the applicant's right to the property was established and that prolonged detention in the police station served no purpose pending trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case