Sunita Vaman Gaikwad vs Khalapur Police Station — 20/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 10th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG080002232026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

190/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar

Judge

1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Sunita Vaman Gaikwad

Adv. Sarita pundalik waghmare

Respondent(s)

Khalapur Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

05-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

27-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

17-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the application under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure and ordered the return of 0.470 milligrams of gold jewelry (valued at Rs. 5,858) to the applicant, Sunita Vaman Gayakwad, who had proven ownership through purchase bills and other documentary evidence. The court rejected the police's argument that the seized article could be modified or sold, finding that the applicant's right to the property was established and that prolonged detention in the police station served no purpose pending trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the application under Section 503 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure and ordered the return of 0.470 milligrams of gold jewelry (valued at Rs. 5,858) to the applicant, Sunita Vaman Gayakwad, who had proven ownership through purchase bills and other documentary evidence. The court rejected the police's argument that the seized article could be modified or sold, finding that the applicant's right to the property was established and that prolonged detention in the police station served no purpose pending trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case