Pravin Tukaram Patil vs Sanjay Dattatrey Pingale — 16/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG080002022025
Filing Number
38/2025
Filing Date
14-Feb-2025
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
14-Feb-2025
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
1-1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pravin Tukaram Patil
Adv. A. L. Balkawade
-
2.Jayashri Pravin Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sanjay Dattatrey Pingale
-
2.Shaila Sanjay Pingale
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
13-Dec-2025
Evidence
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
01-Oct-2025
Issues
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
04-Sep-2025
Issues
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
12-Aug-2025
Issues
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
30-Jul-2025
Issues
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
26-Jun-2025
Issues
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
09-May-2025
Issues
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
28-Apr-2025
W.S. and Say
1 Jt. Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalpuar
-
03-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 16/2025 Summary Pravin Tukaram Patil and Jayashri Pravin Patil sought a temporary injunction against Sanjay Dattatrey Pingale and Shaila Sanjay Pingale to halt construction work on a 3-foot-wide lane adjoining the petitioners' property. The respondents were undertaking renovation of their old house and construction activities (load-bearing work, iron bar installation) that threatened to block the shared lane and potentially damage the petitioners' structure. The court found the petitioners had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored them. The petition was allowed and temporary injunction was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2025
W.S. and Say
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
25-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
19-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
10-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
04-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
27-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
25-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
17-Feb-2025
Awaiting Notice
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
15-Feb-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
15-Feb-2025
First Order
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Khalapur
-
14-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2025
Case 16/2025 Summary Pravin Tukaram Patil and Jayashri Pravin Patil sought a temporary injunction against Sanjay Dattatrey Pingale and Shaila Sanjay Pingale to halt construction work on a 3-foot-wide lane adjoining the petitioners' property. The respondents were undertaking renovation of their old house and construction activities (load-bearing work, iron bar installation) that threatened to block the shared lane and potentially damage the petitioners' structure. The court found the petitioners had established a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored them. The petition was allowed and temporary injunction was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts