Shri. Namdev Sitaram Mundhe Other vs Shri. Govind Ganpat Mundhe Other 5 Advocate - Patankar S.P. — 10/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG080001632017
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
18/2017
Filing Date
03-02-2017
Registration No
10/2017
Registration Date
03-02-2017
Court
Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Khalpuar
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KHALAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Namdev Sitaram Mundhe Other
Shri. Davrakanath Sitaram Mundeh
Adv. Shete D. N.
Smt. Tarabai Madhev Jambhale
Adv. Shete D. N.
Shri. Vasudev Janardan Patil
Adv. Shete D. N.
Smt. Vimal Janardan Patil
Adv. Shete D. N.
Shri. Ravindra Janardan Patil
Adv. Shete D. N.
Respondent(s)
Shri. Govind Ganpat Mundhe Other 5 Advocate - Patankar S.P.
Shri. Suresh Jaganath Mudhe
Shri. Amit Nana Mudhe
Shri. Umesh Suresh Mundhe
Shri. Subhash Bhau Mundhe
Shri. Sudhir Govind Mundhe
Adv. Shete D. N.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KHALAPUR
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 18-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 21-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 02-01-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed under Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Code is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner lacks the necessary standing as a party to the suit and that the suit itself does not establish any connection to the property in question. The court determined that the petitioner has not been impleaded in the original case and therefore cannot seek relief through this petition, ordering the case to be adjourned to 21/01/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed under Rule 10(2) of the Civil Procedure Code is dismissed. The court found that the petitioner lacks the necessary standing as a party to the suit and that the suit itself does not establish any connection to the property in question. The court determined that the petitioner has not been impleaded in the original case and therefore cannot seek relief through this petition, ordering the case to be adjourned to 21/01/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts