State of Maharashtra vs Mohammad Talib Abudl Majid Nawrangge and other — 245/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498,A. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070016622022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1301/2022
Filing Date
29-11-2022
Registration No
245/2022
Registration Date
29-11-2022
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
342
Police Station
Neral Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Mohammad Talib Abudl Majid Nawrangge and other
Kamrunisa Abudl Majid Nawrangge
Abdul Majid Yusuf Nawrangge
Saba Salam Nawrangge
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Karjat acquitted all four accused under IPC Section 498(a) (cruelty against a wife) on March 30, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence proving that the accused subjected the complainant to physical, mental cruelty, or forced her to leave her matrimonial home since their marriage on September 8, 2018. The judgment granted benefit of doubt to the accused, citing lack of concrete proof despite testimony from two witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Karjat acquitted all four accused under IPC Section 498(a) (cruelty against a wife) on March 30, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence proving that the accused subjected the complainant to physical, mental cruelty, or forced her to leave her matrimonial home since their marriage on September 8, 2018. The judgment granted benefit of doubt to the accused, citing lack of concrete proof despite testimony from two witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts