State of Maharashtra vs Hamid Yusuf Narlekar Advocate - Chavan Pramila Rohidas — 616/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070014582025

Filing Number

1111/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

616/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Hamid Yusuf Narlekar Advocate - Chavan Pramila Rohidas

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed during the investigation. Despite the absence of a chemical analysis report, the court concluded that even its filing would not aid prosecution, rendering continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
06-Jan-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Dec-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 616/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed during the investigation. Despite the absence of a chemical analysis report, the court concluded that even its filing would not aid prosecution, rendering continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.