State of Maharashtra vs Hamid Yusuf Narlekar Advocate - Chavan Pramila Rohidas — 616/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070014582025
Filing Number
1111/2025
Filing Date
24-12-2025
Registration No
616/2025
Registration Date
24-12-2025
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Hamid Yusuf Narlekar Advocate - Chavan Pramila Rohidas
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Disposed
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-01-2026 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed during the investigation. Despite the absence of a chemical analysis report, the court concluded that even its filing would not aid prosecution, rendering continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed during the investigation. Despite the absence of a chemical analysis report, the court concluded that even its filing would not aid prosecution, rendering continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts