State of Maharashtra vs Rajendra Bandu Tare Advocate - Chavan Pramila Rohidas — 618/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070014572025

Filing Number

1110/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

618/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajendra Bandu Tare Advocate - Chavan Pramila Rohidas

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate in Karjat discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC due to procedural violations in the investigation, finding that prescribed procedures during raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed, making the case unwinnable regardless of evidence. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and 24 plastic bags of seized liquor were directed to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 618/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate in Karjat discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC due to procedural violations in the investigation, finding that prescribed procedures during raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed, making the case unwinnable regardless of evidence. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and 24 plastic bags of seized liquor were directed to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case