State of Maharashtra vs Rajendra Bandu Tare Advocate - Chavan Pramila Rohidas — 618/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070014572025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1110/2025

Filing Date

24-12-2025

Registration No

618/2025

Registration Date

24-12-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Rajendra Bandu Tare Advocate - Chavan Pramila Rohidas

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

12-03-2026

Disposed

06-01-2026

Plea / Particulars

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Judicial Magistrate in Karjat discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC due to procedural violations in the investigation, finding that prescribed procedures during raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed, making the case unwinnable regardless of evidence. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and 24 plastic bags of seized liquor were directed to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate in Karjat discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC due to procedural violations in the investigation, finding that prescribed procedures during raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed, making the case unwinnable regardless of evidence. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and 24 plastic bags of seized liquor were directed to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case