State of Maharashtra vs Dhau Parshuram Dhule Advocate - Sushant Balaji Puri — 497/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070012612024
Filing Number
965/2024
Filing Date
31-Dec-2024
Registration No
497/2024
Registration Date
31-Dec-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
293
Police Station
Karjat Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhau Parshuram Dhule Advocate - Sushant Balaji Puri
-
2.Ramdas Kanu Dhule
Adv. Sushant Balaji Puri
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed during the investigation. The court determined that even a pending chemical analysis report would not aid prosecution, making further proceedings futile. Seized liquor and instruments were ordered disposed of by the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
06-Feb-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
13-Oct-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
12-Aug-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
30-Jun-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
08-Apr-2025
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
20-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 497/2024
The Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed during the investigation. The court determined that even a pending chemical analysis report would not aid prosecution, making further proceedings futile. Seized liquor and instruments were ordered disposed of by the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts