State of Maharashtra vs Prakash Gokul Lovansi etc Advocate - Bhopatrao Akshay Ravindra — 195/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070012202020
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
983/2020
Filing Date
28-12-2020
Registration No
195/2020
Registration Date
28-12-2020
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
183
Police Station
Karjat Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Prakash Gokul Lovansi etc Advocate - Bhopatrao Akshay Ravindra
Mahadev Jayram Babare
Yogesh Suresh Chaudhari
Adv. Bhopatrao Akshay Ravindra
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 16-12-2025 | Charge | |
| 07-10-2025 | Charge | |
| 07-08-2025 | Charge | |
| 19-06-2025 | Charge |
Interim Orders
The petition (filed under Sections 11 and 16) is dismissed. The court found that the applicant's plea for relief regarding seized mobile phones lacked merit, as the evidence and circumstances did not support overturning the government's seizure order under the Indian Penal Code and the Gambling Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition (filed under Sections 11 and 16) is dismissed. The court found that the applicant's plea for relief regarding seized mobile phones lacked merit, as the evidence and circumstances did not support overturning the government's seizure order under the Indian Penal Code and the Gambling Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts