State of Maharashtra vs Deepak Shankar Saravte Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand — 438/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070010982025

Filing Number

831/2025

Filing Date

10-Oct-2025

Registration No

438/2025

Registration Date

10-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

Karjat Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deepak Shankar Saravte Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 438/2025: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against the accused, finding that prescribed legal procedures were not followed during the raid, seizure of property, and chemical analysis. Since procedural violations undermined the prosecution's case, the court invoked Section 258 CrPC to stop proceedings, discharge the accused, cancel their bail bond, and dispose of seized property per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  4. 13-Jan-2026

    Plea / Particulars

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 438/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 438/2025: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against the accused, finding that prescribed legal procedures were not followed during the raid, seizure of property, and chemical analysis. Since procedural violations undermined the prosecution's case, the court invoked Section 258 CrPC to stop proceedings, discharge the accused, cancel their bail bond, and dispose of seized property per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case