Association Of Enginerring works trade Union through Chairman Shri. Bhushan Datta Samant and other vs Decesed Purushottam Narayan Samant through legal heris Smt Pramodini Purushottam Samant and other Advocate - Pravin Shantaram Khade — 124/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG070010802023
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
239/2023
Filing Date
17-08-2023
Registration No
124/2023
Registration Date
17-08-2023
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Association Of Enginerring works trade Union through Chairman Shri. Bhushan Datta Samant and other
Adv. Ajay Medhi
Sanjay Sadanand Kolavankar
Respondent(s)
Decesed Purushottam Narayan Samant through legal heris Smt Pramodini Purushottam Samant and other Advocate - Pravin Shantaram Khade
Geeta Manohar Prabhu
Anita Nandkumar Samant
Ruta Jitendra Avhad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 05-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 04-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 15-07-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted the petitioner's application to condone the delay in filing affidavits by respondents 1-4, subject to the condition that respondents pay Rs. 500/- as costs to the petitioner. The court found that while respondents had filed some documents earlier, they failed to file the required affidavits on record despite multiple opportunities, and the 2-month delay in filing the present application warranted condonation with cost imposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted the petitioner's application to condone the delay in filing affidavits by respondents 1-4, subject to the condition that respondents pay Rs. 500/- as costs to the petitioner. The court found that while respondents had filed some documents earlier, they failed to file the required affidavits on record despite multiple opportunities, and the 2-month delay in filing the present application warranted condonation with cost imposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts