Association Of Enginerring works trade Union through Chairman Shri. Bhushan Datta Samant and other vs Decesed Purushottam Narayan Samant through legal heris Smt Pramodini Purushottam Samant and other Advocate - Pravin Shantaram Khade — 124/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG070010802023

Filing Number

239/2023

Filing Date

17-Aug-2023

Registration No

124/2023

Registration Date

17-Aug-2023

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Association Of Enginerring works trade Union through Chairman Shri. Bhushan Datta Samant and other

    Adv. Ajay Medhi

  2. 2.Sanjay Sadanand Kolavankar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Decesed Purushottam Narayan Samant through legal heris Smt Pramodini Purushottam Samant and other Advocate - Pravin Shantaram Khade

  2. 2.Geeta Manohar Prabhu

  3. 3.Anita Nandkumar Samant

  4. 4.Ruta Jitendra Avhad

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  4. 04-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  5. 16-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  6. 15-Jul-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt Civil Judge J D Karjat

  7. 09-May-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  8. 28-Apr-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  9. 10-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  10. 21-Jan-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  11. 29-Nov-2024

    Order on Exh

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  12. 18-Oct-2024

    Order on Exh

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  13. 26-Aug-2024

    Order on Exh

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  14. 20-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  15. 02-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  16. 25-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat

  17. 15-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  18. 13-Feb-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court granted the petitioner's application to condone the delay in filing affidavits by respondents 1-4, subject to the condition that respondents pay Rs. 500/- as costs to the petitioner. The court found that while respondents had filed some documents earlier, they failed to file the required affidavits on record despite multiple opportunities, and the 2-month delay in filing the present application warranted condonation with cost imposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  19. 13-Feb-2024

    Steps

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  20. 19-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  21. 20-Nov-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  22. 30-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  23. 09-Oct-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  24. 18-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 17-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 124/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted the petitioner's application to condone the delay in filing affidavits by respondents 1-4, subject to the condition that respondents pay Rs. 500/- as costs to the petitioner. The court found that while respondents had filed some documents earlier, they failed to file the required affidavits on record despite multiple opportunities, and the 2-month delay in filing the present application warranted condonation with cost imposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case