State of Maharashtra vs Jayesh Raman Badekar Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand — 422/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070010552025
Filing Number
803/2025
Filing Date
29-09-2025
Registration No
422/2025
Registration Date
29-09-2025
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
226
Police Station
Karjat Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Jayesh Raman Badekar Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Disposed
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Plea / Particulars |
| 13-01-2026 | Plea / Particulars |
| 26-11-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.C.C No. 422/2025 The court discharged the accused in a Bombay Prohibition Act section 65(E) case, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed. Invoking section 258 CrPC, the court stopped proceedings as maintaining the case served no purpose, and directed seizure disposal to the State Excise department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S.C.C No. 422/2025 The court discharged the accused in a Bombay Prohibition Act section 65(E) case, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed. Invoking section 258 CrPC, the court stopped proceedings as maintaining the case served no purpose, and directed seizure disposal to the State Excise department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts