State of Maharashtra vs Rupesh Narayan Waghmare Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand — 414/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070010432025
Filing Number
796/2025
Filing Date
23-Sep-2025
Registration No
414/2025
Registration Date
23-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
211
Police Station
Karjat Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rupesh Narayan Waghmare Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate at Karjat discharged the accused in a liquor seizure case, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed during investigation. Invoking Section 258 CrPC, the court stopped proceedings as no meaningful prosecution could proceed even with a chemical analysis report, and directed the seized 20-liter liquor container to the State Excise department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
26-Dec-2025
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
19-Nov-2025
Plea / Particulars
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
06-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 414/2025
The Judicial Magistrate at Karjat discharged the accused in a liquor seizure case, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed during investigation. Invoking Section 258 CrPC, the court stopped proceedings as no meaningful prosecution could proceed even with a chemical analysis report, and directed the seized 20-liter liquor container to the State Excise department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts