State of Maharashtra vs Raghunath Sakharam Kharmare Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand — 416/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070010422025

Filing Number

795/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

416/2025

Registration Date

23-Sep-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

218

Police Station

Karjat Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raghunath Sakharam Kharmare Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and discharged the accused due to procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure of evidence, and chemical analysis were not followed, making the prosecution's case untenable even with a chemical analysis report. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and the seized liquor was directed to the State Excise department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  4. 26-Dec-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  6. 06-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 416/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and discharged the accused due to procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure of evidence, and chemical analysis were not followed, making the prosecution's case untenable even with a chemical analysis report. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and the seized liquor was directed to the State Excise department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case