State of Maharashtra vs Raghunath Sakharam Kharmare Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand — 416/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070010422025

Case disposed

Filing Number

795/2025

Filing Date

23-09-2025

Registration No

416/2025

Registration Date

23-09-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

218

Police Station

Karjat Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Raghunath Sakharam Kharmare Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

12-03-2026

Disposed

26-12-2025

Plea / Particulars

19-11-2025

Plea / Particulars

06-10-2025

Plea / Particulars

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and discharged the accused due to procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure of evidence, and chemical analysis were not followed, making the prosecution's case untenable even with a chemical analysis report. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and the seized liquor was directed to the State Excise department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and discharged the accused due to procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure of evidence, and chemical analysis were not followed, making the prosecution's case untenable even with a chemical analysis report. The accused's bail bond was cancelled and the seized liquor was directed to the State Excise department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case