Shaila Maruti Dabhane vs Krushna Kumar Thakur Advocate - Nigudkar Rajendra Pandharinath — 99/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),336(3),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG070008892024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-09-2024

Filing Number

675/2024

Filing Date

23-09-2024

Registration No

99/2024

Registration Date

23-09-2024

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),336(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Shaila Maruti Dabhane

Adv. MAYEKAR UTTARA MURLIDHAR

Respondent(s)

Krushna Kumar Thakur Advocate - Nigudkar Rajendra Pandharinath

Nandu Narayan Gangawane

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

16-04-2026

Disposed

09-04-2026

Arguments

30-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

05-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Shaila Maruti Dabhane v. Krushna Kumar Thakur & Others (Case 99/2024) The court dismissed the complaint filed by Shaila Maruti Dabhane against the respondents for alleged forgery of a power of attorney, fraudulent property transfer, and misappropriation of land acquisition compensation. The Judicial Magistrate found insufficient prima facie evidence of deliberate forgery or criminal intent, noting that the core dispute concerns heirship, title validity, and inheritance rights—matters already under inquiry before revenue authorities and therefore primarily civil/revenue issues rather than criminal ones. The court emphasized that the complaint was filed 15 years after the sale deeds were executed, only after substantial compensation became payable, and lacked corroborating witness testimony or forensic evidence to substantiate forgery allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Shaila Maruti Dabhane v. Krushna Kumar Thakur & Others (Case 99/2024) The court dismissed the complaint filed by Shaila Maruti Dabhane against the respondents for alleged forgery of a power of attorney, fraudulent property transfer, and misappropriation of land acquisition compensation. The Judicial Magistrate found insufficient prima facie evidence of deliberate forgery or criminal intent, noting that the core dispute concerns heirship, title validity, and inheritance rights—matters already under inquiry before revenue authorities and therefore primarily civil/revenue issues rather than criminal ones. The court emphasized that the complaint was filed 15 years after the sale deeds were executed, only after substantial compensation became payable, and lacked corroborating witness testimony or forensic evidence to substantiate forgery allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case