State of Maharashtra vs Ashok Baban Gaikwad Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand — 345/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070008762025

Filing Number

663/2025

Filing Date

04-Aug-2025

Registration No

345/2025

Registration Date

04-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

156

Police Station

Karjat Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Ashok Baban Gaikwad Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Karjat discharged the accused under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedural safeguards during raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed, rendering the prosecution's case fundamentally defective. The court stopped proceedings, discharged the accused, cancelled bail, and directed disposal of seized liquor to the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
15-Jan-2026

Awaiting Summons

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
06-Nov-2025

Awaiting Summons

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
04-Sep-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
04-Aug-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 345/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court at Karjat discharged the accused under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedural safeguards during raid, seizure, and chemical analysis were not followed, rendering the prosecution's case fundamentally defective. The court stopped proceedings, discharged the accused, cancelled bail, and directed disposal of seized liquor to the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.