State of Maharashtra vs Suresh Hiraman Mukne Advocate - Jyotsna Pankaj Shalke — 334/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070008612024

Filing Number

658/2024

Filing Date

23-Aug-2024

Registration No

334/2024

Registration Date

23-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

175

Police Station

Karjat Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Suresh Hiraman Mukne Advocate - Jyotsna Pankaj Shalke

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and acquitted the accused, finding that prescribed procedures during raid, seizure, and chemical sample handling were not followed. The court determined that even a chemical analysis report would not aid prosecution and no purpose would be served continuing the case, hence the bail bond was cancelled and seized property disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
12-Jan-2026

Hearing

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
15-Nov-2025

Hearing

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
07-Oct-2025

Hearing

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
11-Aug-2025

Hearing

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
06-Jun-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
27-Jan-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
06-Dec-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
15-Oct-2024

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
23-Aug-2024

Case filed

Registration No. 334/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and acquitted the accused, finding that prescribed procedures during raid, seizure, and chemical sample handling were not followed. The court determined that even a chemical analysis report would not aid prosecution and no purpose would be served continuing the case, hence the bail bond was cancelled and seized property disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.