Vilas Laxuman Dhule others-7 vs Gopal Sakharam Sonavle others-16 Advocate - Pramod Surve — 91/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG070007522023

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

168/2023

Filing Date

06-06-2023

Registration No

91/2023

Registration Date

06-06-2023

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Vilas Laxuman Dhule others-7

Adv. Puja Kondekar

Devchandra Laxman Dhule

Anil Laxman Dhule

Surekha Deepak Vaikar

Vandan Harichandra Dhumal

Surendra Nago Mhaskar

Shevanta Kashinath Pemare

Shaila Alias Sangeeta Shivram Masane

Respondent(s)

Gopal Sakharam Sonavle others-16 Advocate - Pramod Surve

Shankar Sakharam Sonavale

Pandhrinath Sakharam Sonavale

Santosh Sakharam Sonavale

Hausabai Raghunath Bhoir

Vijaya Ramdas Bhavare

Kamal Balaram Mehar

Sanjivani Santosh Dhule

Sameer Ananta Bhoir

Chetan Ananta Bhoir

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

24-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

22-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-12-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-11-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

25-06-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Civil Suit No. 91/2023, the court allowed the condonation of delay application filed by defendants No. 1 to 5, 7, 8, 11 to 15 for filing their written statement. The defendants cited illness as the reason for the delay, and the court found no prejudice would be caused to plaintiffs by allowing the application. The written statement will be recorded upon payment of costs of Rs. 800/- to the plaintiffs by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Suit No. 91/2023, the court allowed the condonation of delay application filed by defendants No. 1 to 5, 7, 8, 11 to 15 for filing their written statement. The defendants cited illness as the reason for the delay, and the court found no prejudice would be caused to plaintiffs by allowing the application. The written statement will be recorded upon payment of costs of Rs. 800/- to the plaintiffs by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case