Uttam Shankar Chavan vs Shivbhakta Jatin Mobile Shop Tarfe — 176/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070006152022
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
451/2022
Filing Date
22-04-2022
Registration No
176/2022
Registration Date
22-04-2022
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Uttam Shankar Chavan
Adv. Gitesh Sawant
Respondent(s)
Shivbhakta Jatin Mobile Shop Tarfe
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 20-02-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 29-01-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 30-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The accused's application under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code to dismiss the Negotiable Instrument Act complaint was rejected. The court held that once process was issued under Section 204, it cannot revisit earlier procedural stages, relying on Supreme Court precedent in Iris Computer Ltd. v. Askari Infotech. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The accused's application under Section 203 of the Criminal Procedure Code to dismiss the Negotiable Instrument Act complaint was rejected. The court held that once process was issued under Section 204, it cannot revisit earlier procedural stages, relying on Supreme Court precedent in Iris Computer Ltd. v. Askari Infotech. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts