State of Maharashtra vs Gajanan Kalu Pawar Advocate - Sawant Gitesh Motiram — 179/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 120 b. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070006092021
Filing Number
476/2021
Filing Date
20-May-2021
Registration No
179/2021
Registration Date
20-May-2021
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
Taloja Police Station
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gajanan Kalu Pawar Advocate - Sawant Gitesh Motiram
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Karjat, Raigad acquitted defendant Gajanan Kalu Pawar of wildlife poaching charges under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and Indian Forest Act, 1927. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused hunted a tiger, extracted its nails and teeth, and kept them at his residence, as the evidence presented was insufficient and lacked credible eyewitness testimony to support the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
20-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
08-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
29-Sep-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
21-Aug-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
10-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
19-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Ready
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
10-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
12-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
10-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
16-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
21-Jun-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
19-Mar-2024
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
12-Jan-2024
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
01-Dec-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
06-Oct-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
11-Aug-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
16-Jun-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
15-Apr-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
14-Feb-2023
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
26-Dec-2022
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
07-Nov-2022
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
26-Aug-2022
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
01-Jul-2022
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
10-May-2022
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
15-Mar-2022
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
13-Dec-2021
Hearing
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
05-Oct-2021
Awaiting Summons
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
28-Jun-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 179/2021
Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Karjat, Raigad acquitted defendant Gajanan Kalu Pawar of wildlife poaching charges under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 and Indian Forest Act, 1927. The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused hunted a tiger, extracted its nails and teeth, and kept them at his residence, as the evidence presented was insufficient and lacked credible eyewitness testimony to support the allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts