State of Maharashtra vs Arun Kondiba Suryvanshi Advocate - Basare Pooja Manohar — 258/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070006062024
Filing Number
473/2024
Filing Date
30-05-2024
Registration No
258/2024
Registration Date
30-05-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
Neral Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Arun Kondiba Suryvanshi Advocate - Basare Pooja Manohar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Disposed
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-02-2026 | Plea / Particulars |
| 26-11-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
| 13-10-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
| 29-07-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged the accused in a Bombay Prohibition Act section 65(E) case, finding that prescribed procedural requirements during raid, seizure, and sample collection were not followed, rendering the evidence unreliable for prosecution. The proceedings were stopped under section 258 CrPC, the accused discharged, bail bond cancelled, and seized liquor sent for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged the accused in a Bombay Prohibition Act section 65(E) case, finding that prescribed procedural requirements during raid, seizure, and sample collection were not followed, rendering the evidence unreliable for prosecution. The proceedings were stopped under section 258 CrPC, the accused discharged, bail bond cancelled, and seized liquor sent for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts