State of Maharashtra vs Arun Kondiba Suryvanshi Advocate - Basare Pooja Manohar — 258/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070006062024

Filing Number

473/2024

Filing Date

30-May-2024

Registration No

258/2024

Registration Date

30-May-2024

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

103

Police Station

Neral Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Arun Kondiba Suryvanshi Advocate - Basare Pooja Manohar

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court discharged the accused in a Bombay Prohibition Act section 65(E) case, finding that prescribed procedural requirements during raid, seizure, and sample collection were not followed, rendering the evidence unreliable for prosecution. The proceedings were stopped under section 258 CrPC, the accused discharged, bail bond cancelled, and seized liquor sent for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
03-Feb-2026

Plea / Particulars

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
26-Nov-2025

Plea / Particulars

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
13-Oct-2025

Plea / Particulars

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
29-Jul-2025

Plea / Particulars

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
21-Apr-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
01-Jan-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
04-Oct-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
12-Jul-2024

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
30-May-2024

Case filed

Registration No. 258/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused in a Bombay Prohibition Act section 65(E) case, finding that prescribed procedural requirements during raid, seizure, and sample collection were not followed, rendering the evidence unreliable for prosecution. The proceedings were stopped under section 258 CrPC, the accused discharged, bail bond cancelled, and seized liquor sent for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.