State of Maharashtra vs Sagar Maruti Gaikwad Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand — 238/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070005882024
Filing Number
455/2024
Filing Date
20-May-2024
Registration No
238/2024
Registration Date
20-May-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
129
Police Station
Karjat Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sagar Maruti Gaikwad Advocate - Oswal Ashok Lalchand
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate in Karjat discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical sample analysis were not followed during the investigation, rendering the case unviable for prosecution despite potential Chemical Analysis reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
03-Jan-2026
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
24-Nov-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
07-Oct-2025
Filing of Surety
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
-
04-Jul-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt Civil Judge J D Karjat
-
02-Jul-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt Civil Judge J D Karjat
-
04-Mar-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
28-Jan-2025
Filing of Surety
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
26-Nov-2024
Filing of Surety
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
06-Sep-2024
Filing of Surety
Jt Civil Judge, Junior Division, Karjat
-
28-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 238/2024
The Judicial Magistrate in Karjat discharged the accused and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure, and chemical sample analysis were not followed during the investigation, rendering the case unviable for prosecution despite potential Chemical Analysis reports. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts