Shekhar Ramkrushn Deshmukha vs Dilip Ganapat Khisamatrav Advocate - Kishor Deshmukh — 62/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1908. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG070005332024
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
09-05-2024
Filing Number
134/2024
Filing Date
15-05-2024
Registration No
62/2024
Registration Date
15-05-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shekhar Ramkrushn Deshmukha
Adv. PADIR DEEPAK RAKHMAJI
Sulabha Anil Kulkarni
Adv. PADIR DEEPAK RAKHMAJI
Respondent(s)
Dilip Ganapat Khisamatrav Advocate - Kishor Deshmukh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Steps_Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 09-12-2025 | Appearance | |
| 22-09-2025 | Appearance | |
| 18-07-2025 | Steps_Unready | |
| 05-05-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for condonation of delay filed by Defendant No.1 in Regular Civil Suit No.62/2024 has been allowed. The defendant's 146-day delay in filing the written statement due to non-availability of documents was condoned by the court, as it was necessary for deciding the real controversy between parties. The defendant must pay Rs. 200 as cost to the plaintiffs on or before the next date, after which the written statement will be recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for condonation of delay filed by Defendant No.1 in Regular Civil Suit No.62/2024 has been allowed. The defendant's 146-day delay in filing the written statement due to non-availability of documents was condoned by the court, as it was necessary for deciding the real controversy between parties. The defendant must pay Rs. 200 as cost to the plaintiffs on or before the next date, after which the written statement will be recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts