State of Maharashtra vs Tukaram Undru Patil Advocate - Adv. Ashok Oswal — 139/2021
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG070005212021
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
397/2021
Filing Date
07-05-2021
Registration No
139/2021
Registration Date
07-05-2021
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
4
Police Station
Neral Police Station
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Undru Patil Advocate - Adv. Ashok Oswal
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 11-12-2025 | Arguments | |
| 13-11-2025 | Arguments | |
| 16-10-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In S.C.C. No. 139/2021, the Judicial Magistrate closed the prosecution's evidence after examining only 2 witnesses, as other summoned witnesses failed to appear despite issuance of summons and warrants. The case is now scheduled for the accused's statement under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In S.C.C. No. 139/2021, the Judicial Magistrate closed the prosecution's evidence after examining only 2 witnesses, as other summoned witnesses failed to appear despite issuance of summons and warrants. The case is now scheduled for the accused's statement under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts