State of Maharashtra vs Dinesh Mukund Karale Advocate - Basare Pooja Manohar — 194/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(F). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070004882025

Filing Number

359/2025

Filing Date

28-Apr-2025

Registration No

194/2025

Registration Date

28-Apr-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Neral Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(F)

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Dinesh Mukund Karale Advocate - Basare Pooja Manohar

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Judicial Magistrate in Karjat acquitted the accused under section 258 of the CrPC after finding that prescribed procedural requirements for raid, seizure of evidence, and chemical analysis were not followed during investigation. The court concluded that even if a chemical analysis report were filed, it would not assist prosecution, making continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
17-Dec-2025

Hearing

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
28-Oct-2025

Charge

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
22-Aug-2025

Plea / Particulars

CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat
30-May-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
28-Apr-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 194/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate in Karjat acquitted the accused under section 258 of the CrPC after finding that prescribed procedural requirements for raid, seizure of evidence, and chemical analysis were not followed during investigation. The court concluded that even if a chemical analysis report were filed, it would not assist prosecution, making continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.