State of Maharashtra vs Satish Motiram Kamble — 134/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070004862025

Filing Number

357/2025

Filing Date

21-Mar-2025

Registration No

134/2025

Registration Date

21-Mar-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Karjat Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Satish Motiram Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karjat, discharged accused Satish Motiram Kamble and stopped proceedings in this summons case under Section 258 of the CrPC due to the prosecution's inability to secure the accused's presence for a prolonged period and lack of steps to ensure trial. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and no appeal is permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Plea / Particulars

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  6. 22-Sep-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Karjat

  7. 27-Jun-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt Civil Judge J D Karjat

  8. 10-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 134/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Karjat, discharged accused Satish Motiram Kamble and stopped proceedings in this summons case under Section 258 of the CrPC due to the prosecution's inability to secure the accused's presence for a prolonged period and lack of steps to ensure trial. The accused's bail bonds were cancelled and no appeal is permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case