State of Maharashtra vs Ramchandra Balu Hirve Advocate - Thakare Shankesh Rajesh — 154/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG070004632025

Case disposed

Filing Number

337/2025

Filing Date

03-04-2025

Registration No

154/2025

Registration Date

03-04-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

8

Police Station

Karjat Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)(a)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ramchandra Balu Hirve Advocate - Thakare Shankesh Rajesh

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

12-03-2026

Disposed

20-01-2026

Plea / Particulars

06-11-2025

Plea / Particulars

22-09-2025

Plea / Particulars

24-06-2025

Plea / Particulars

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 154/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate of Karjat stopped criminal proceedings against the accused under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure of property, and chemical analysis sampling were not followed during investigation. The court discharged the accused, cancelled the bail bond, and disposed of the seized property, concluding that proceeding further would serve no purpose as the prosecution's case was procedurally compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 154/2025 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate of Karjat stopped criminal proceedings against the accused under Section 258 CrPC, finding that prescribed procedures for raid, seizure of property, and chemical analysis sampling were not followed during investigation. The court discharged the accused, cancelled the bail bond, and disposed of the seized property, concluding that proceeding further would serve no purpose as the prosecution's case was procedurally compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case