Kamini Shailendra Lanke vs Krushna Dhondu Aambavane Advocate - More K. G. — 50/2021
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 8. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG070004502021
Next Hearing
21st July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
117/2021
Filing Date
27-04-2021
Registration No
50/2021
Registration Date
27-04-2021
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamini Shailendra Lanke
Adv. Urankar
Respondent(s)
Krushna Dhondu Aambavane Advocate - More K. G.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Hearing | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 20-01-2026 | Hearing | |
| 04-11-2025 | Hearing | |
| 23-09-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the application for temporary injunction filed by Kamini Shailendra Lanke and another against Krushna Dhondu Ambavane. The court restrained Opponent No.1 from alienating or creating third-party interest over the disputed land property in Karjat, Raigad, pending final decision of the main proceedings. The court found prima facie merit in the applicants' claim that the ex-parte decree in the underlying civil suit was obtained through procedurally defective service of summons, and directed both parties to expedite trial completion within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the application for temporary injunction filed by Kamini Shailendra Lanke and another against Krushna Dhondu Ambavane. The court restrained Opponent No.1 from alienating or creating third-party interest over the disputed land property in Karjat, Raigad, pending final decision of the main proceedings. The court found prima facie merit in the applicants' claim that the ex-parte decree in the underlying civil suit was obtained through procedurally defective service of summons, and directed both parties to expedite trial completion within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts