Kamal Arjun Bhoir Ex-Shrami Kamal Vendu Salokhe vs Maruti Vendu Salokhe @ 1 Advocate - sawant sarat — 56/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHRG070004232023

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

14th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

112/2023

Filing Date

03-04-2023

Registration No

56/2023

Registration Date

11-04-2023

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2,

Petitioner(s)

Kamal Arjun Bhoir Ex-Shrami Kamal Vendu Salokhe

Adv. Sawant Gitesh Motiram

Respondent(s)

Maruti Vendu Salokhe @ 1 Advocate - sawant sarat

Vimal Shivaji Thakre

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

30-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

10-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

13-01-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-09-2025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-07-2025

W.S. and Say

Interim Orders

27-09-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court rejected the defendant's application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's partition suit. The court found that the plaintiff has pleaded undivided share in the suit properties based on 7/12 extracts and mutation entries showing her as a legal heir, which requires full trial to adjudicate. The court held that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law that cannot be decided at the threshold stage, and the defendant's application lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the defendant's application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's partition suit. The court found that the plaintiff has pleaded undivided share in the suit properties based on 7/12 extracts and mutation entries showing her as a legal heir, which requires full trial to adjudicate. The court held that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law that cannot be decided at the threshold stage, and the defendant's application lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case