Kamal Arjun Bhoir Ex-Shrami Kamal Vendu Salokhe vs Maruti Vendu Salokhe @ 1 Advocate - sawant sarat — 56/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG070004232023
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
112/2023
Filing Date
03-04-2023
Registration No
56/2023
Registration Date
11-04-2023
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamal Arjun Bhoir Ex-Shrami Kamal Vendu Salokhe
Adv. Sawant Gitesh Motiram
Respondent(s)
Maruti Vendu Salokhe @ 1 Advocate - sawant sarat
Vimal Shivaji Thakre
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 13-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 23-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 15-07-2025 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the defendant's application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's partition suit. The court found that the plaintiff has pleaded undivided share in the suit properties based on 7/12 extracts and mutation entries showing her as a legal heir, which requires full trial to adjudicate. The court held that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law that cannot be decided at the threshold stage, and the defendant's application lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the defendant's application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's partition suit. The court found that the plaintiff has pleaded undivided share in the suit properties based on 7/12 extracts and mutation entries showing her as a legal heir, which requires full trial to adjudicate. The court held that limitation is a mixed question of fact and law that cannot be decided at the threshold stage, and the defendant's application lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts