Prabhakar Ramesh Wayle vs State of Maharashtra Through Rajya Utpadan Shulk Karjat — 28/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHRG070002292026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
169/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
Police Station
Kolad Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhakar Ramesh Wayle
Adv. BASARE POOJA MANOHAR
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Rajya Utpadan Shulk Karjat
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 04-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 28-02-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 27-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted the applicant's petition under CrPC Section 503 for release of his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (Registration No. MH-05EL1714) on an interim basis upon depositing a security bond of ₹3,00,000, finding that the vehicle's continued seizure by the Excise Police Station serves no investigative purpose since ownership is clearly established. The court imposed conditions that the applicant cannot alter, transfer, or dispose of the vehicle without court permission, and must produce it for investigation as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the applicant's petition under CrPC Section 503 for release of his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (Registration No. MH-05EL1714) on an interim basis upon depositing a security bond of ₹3,00,000, finding that the vehicle's continued seizure by the Excise Police Station serves no investigative purpose since ownership is clearly established. The court imposed conditions that the applicant cannot alter, transfer, or dispose of the vehicle without court permission, and must produce it for investigation as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts