Prabhakar Ramesh Wayle vs State of Maharashtra Through Rajya Utpadan Shulk Karjat — 28/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHRG070002292026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat

Judge

2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

Police Station

Kolad Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Prabhakar Ramesh Wayle

Adv. BASARE POOJA MANOHAR

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Rajya Utpadan Shulk Karjat

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Order on Exh

04-03-2026

Order on Exh

28-02-2026

Order on Exh

27-02-2026

Order on Exh

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

The court granted the applicant's petition under CrPC Section 503 for release of his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (Registration No. MH-05EL1714) on an interim basis upon depositing a security bond of ₹3,00,000, finding that the vehicle's continued seizure by the Excise Police Station serves no investigative purpose since ownership is clearly established. The court imposed conditions that the applicant cannot alter, transfer, or dispose of the vehicle without court permission, and must produce it for investigation as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the applicant's petition under CrPC Section 503 for release of his seized Mahindra Bolero pickup vehicle (Registration No. MH-05EL1714) on an interim basis upon depositing a security bond of ₹3,00,000, finding that the vehicle's continued seizure by the Excise Police Station serves no investigative purpose since ownership is clearly established. The court imposed conditions that the applicant cannot alter, transfer, or dispose of the vehicle without court permission, and must produce it for investigation as needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case