Janabai Parshuram Mhaskar urf Pramila Parshuram Mhaskar vs Motiram Gopal Shende etc 2 Advocate - Dayare Satish Dharma — 1/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1,. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG070000342020
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2020
Filing Date
08-01-2020
Registration No
1/2020
Registration Date
08-01-2020
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karjat
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Janabai Parshuram Mhaskar urf Pramila Parshuram Mhaskar
Adv. masane s.
Respondent(s)
Motiram Gopal Shende etc 2 Advocate - Dayare Satish Dharma
Devashish Anil Nigu
Ravindra Laxman Hajare
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. KARJAT
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 05-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 06-10-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 12-08-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 17-06-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's petition and ordered correction of the property description in the original deed. The court directed that all references to Survey No. 28, Part 2 in the property document be amended to reflect the correct survey numbers, and granted the plaintiff's plea to implead the buyer (Defendant No. 4) as a necessary party to the suit. The petition was disposed of with directions for rectification of the deed records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's petition and ordered correction of the property description in the original deed. The court directed that all references to Survey No. 28, Part 2 in the property document be amended to reflect the correct survey numbers, and granted the plaintiff's plea to implead the buyer (Defendant No. 4) as a necessary party to the suit. The petition was disposed of with directions for rectification of the deed records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts