Vishwanath Budhaji Patil vs Gajanan Budhaji Patil — 117/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 24,28. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE on 18th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG060014492025
e-Filing Number
08-12-2025
Filing Number
285/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
117/2025
Registration Date
11-Dec-2025
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE DURING OR AFTER EVIDENCE
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vishwanath Budhaji Patil
Adv. PATIL ABHIJEET BHARAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gajanan Budhaji Patil
-
2.Bharat Budhaji Patil
-
3.Radhabai Shyam Patil
-
4.Vikas Shyam Patil
-
5.Sandesh Shyam Patil
-
6.Navita Ganesh Gaikar
-
7.Nirmala Ramchandra Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 117/2025 (Vishwanath Patil vs. Gajanan Patil), the court disposed of the case after the plaintiff and defendants reached an amicable settlement. The court passed a compromise decree based on the terms filed by both parties, with no order as to costs and court fee refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
28-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
04-Feb-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
27-Jan-2026
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
15-Jan-2026
Issues
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
17-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 117/2025
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 117/2025 (Vishwanath Patil vs. Gajanan Patil), the court disposed of the case after the plaintiff and defendants reached an amicable settlement. The court passed a compromise decree based on the terms filed by both parties, with no order as to costs and court fee refunded to the plaintiff as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts