State of Maharashtra vs Nandlal Ramnkshtr Gupta — 667/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG060012362024
Filing Number
936/2024
Filing Date
19-Dec-2024
Registration No
667/2024
Registration Date
19-Dec-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Pen Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nandlal Ramnkshtr Gupta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court discharged accused Nandlal Gupta of charges under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The court found that since the accused could not be traced despite efforts over 15 months, and the offense carried only fine as punishment, there was no justification to keep the matter pending indefinitely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
10-Dec-2025
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
13-Sep-2025
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
25-Jul-2025
Lok-Nyayalaya
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
10-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
22-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
04-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
01-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
04-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 667/2024
Summary: The court discharged accused Nandlal Gupta of charges under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The court found that since the accused could not be traced despite efforts over 15 months, and the offense carried only fine as punishment, there was no justification to keep the matter pending indefinitely. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts