State of Maharashtra vs Tukaram Babasaheb Dhanve — 658/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 85(1)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG060012142024
Filing Number
921/2024
Filing Date
17-Dec-2024
Registration No
658/2024
Registration Date
17-Dec-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
308
Police Station
Pen Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tukaram Babasaheb Dhanve
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Tukaram Babasaheb Dhanave of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita by stopping proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC, citing the case's age (over 1 year 4 months) and the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical analysis report despite multiple opportunities. Seized property will be disposed per law after the appeal period expires, with police records retained for potential case reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
20-Feb-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
13-Dec-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
08-Dec-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
03-Oct-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
21-Jul-2025
Steps_Unready
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
16-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
11-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
20-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 658/2024
The court discharged accused Tukaram Babasaheb Dhanave of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita by stopping proceedings under Section 258 of CrPC, citing the case's age (over 1 year 4 months) and the prosecution's failure to produce the chemical analysis report despite multiple opportunities. Seized property will be disposed per law after the appeal period expires, with police records retained for potential case reopening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts