State vs Rupesh Datta Patil — 704/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060011602025

Filing Number

937/2025

Filing Date

13-Oct-2025

Registration No

704/2025

Registration Date

16-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rupesh Datta Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 704/2025 Summary Court Decision: Rupesh Datta Patil was acquitted of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country-made liquor. The court found that while seized materials were recovered from the accused's possession, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient chemical analysis reports and witness testimony to conclusively prove the substance was alcohol, thus the accused benefited from the reasonable doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen

  5. 26-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen

  6. 04-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 704/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 704/2025 Summary Court Decision: Rupesh Datta Patil was acquitted of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for alleged illegal possession and sale of country-made liquor. The court found that while seized materials were recovered from the accused's possession, the prosecution failed to provide sufficient chemical analysis reports and witness testimony to conclusively prove the substance was alcohol, thus the accused benefited from the reasonable doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case