State of Maharashtra vs Avinash Jagannath Mhatre-17 Advocate - Desale M.B. — 119/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,188,336,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060011542022

Filing Number

844/2022

Filing Date

08-Sep-2022

Registration No

119/2022

Registration Date

08-Sep-2022

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

142

Police Station

Pen Police Station

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,188,336,427
Maharashtra Police Act Section 37(1)(3)/135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Avinash Jagannath Mhatre-17 Advocate - Desale M.B.

  2. 2.Kishor Orsmal Jain

  3. 3.Naresh Maruti Gavand

  4. 4.Tushar Bhagwan Mankavale

  5. 5.Sanjay Shankar Patil

  6. 6.Gajanan Lahu Mokal

  7. 7.Achyut Gajanan Patil

  8. 8.Ashok Waman Wartak

  9. 9.Rajaram Balkrushna Patil

  10. 10.Shritej Anil Kadam

  11. 11.Nandkishor Janardhan Mokal

  12. 12.Pankaj Suresh Shaha

  13. 13.Hiraji Laxman Chogale

  14. 14.Dipashri Dinesh Potphode

  15. 15.Preshita Tushar Thakur

  16. 16.Mahananda Jayram Tandel

  17. 17.Naresh Nathuram Sonawane

  18. 18.Chetan Satish Mokal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Judgment Summary Case: Regular Criminal Case No. 119/2022, Pench First Class Magistrate Court, Raygad District Decision: The court acquitted all 18 accused persons of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 149, 188, 336, 427, and Maharashtra Police Act section 37(1)(3)/135. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole complainant witness provided inconsistent testimony and admitted to a settlement with the accused outside court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  6. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  7. 08-Jul-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  8. 24-Apr-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  9. 20-Feb-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  10. 19-Dec-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  11. 03-Oct-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  12. 09-Jul-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  13. 14-May-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  14. 05-Mar-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  15. 28-Dec-2023

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  16. 26-Sep-2023

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  17. 27-Jun-2023

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  18. 17-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  19. 06-Feb-2023

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  20. 15-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 08-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 119/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary Case: Regular Criminal Case No. 119/2022, Pench First Class Magistrate Court, Raygad District Decision: The court acquitted all 18 accused persons of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 149, 188, 336, 427, and Maharashtra Police Act section 37(1)(3)/135. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole complainant witness provided inconsistent testimony and admitted to a settlement with the accused outside court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case