State of Maharashtra vs Avinash Jagannath Mhatre-17 Advocate - Desale M.B. — 119/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,188,336,427. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG060011542022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
844/2022
Filing Date
08-09-2022
Registration No
119/2022
Registration Date
08-09-2022
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
142
Police Station
Pen Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
Avinash Jagannath Mhatre-17 Advocate - Desale M.B.
Kishor Orsmal Jain
Naresh Maruti Gavand
Tushar Bhagwan Mankavale
Sanjay Shankar Patil
Gajanan Lahu Mokal
Achyut Gajanan Patil
Ashok Waman Wartak
Rajaram Balkrushna Patil
Shritej Anil Kadam
Nandkishor Janardhan Mokal
Pankaj Suresh Shaha
Hiraji Laxman Chogale
Dipashri Dinesh Potphode
Preshita Tushar Thakur
Mahananda Jayram Tandel
Naresh Nathuram Sonawane
Chetan Satish Mokal
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 18-09-2025 | Evidence | |
| 08-07-2025 | Charge |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary Case: Regular Criminal Case No. 119/2022, Pench First Class Magistrate Court, Raygad District Decision: The court acquitted all 18 accused persons of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 149, 188, 336, 427, and Maharashtra Police Act section 37(1)(3)/135. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole complainant witness provided inconsistent testimony and admitted to a settlement with the accused outside court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary Case: Regular Criminal Case No. 119/2022, Pench First Class Magistrate Court, Raygad District Decision: The court acquitted all 18 accused persons of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 149, 188, 336, 427, and Maharashtra Police Act section 37(1)(3)/135. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the sole complainant witness provided inconsistent testimony and admitted to a settlement with the accused outside court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts