State of Maharashtra vs Sunil Shantaram Patil — 570/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(B)(C)(F). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060011032024

Filing Number

821/2024

Filing Date

29-Nov-2024

Registration No

570/2024

Registration Date

29-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

290

Police Station

Pen Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(B)(C)(F)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Shantaram Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and discharged accused Sunil Shantaram Patil of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the case's age (over 1 year 4 months) and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunity. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 09-Dec-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 20-Sep-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  6. 15-Jul-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  7. 03-May-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  8. 27-Feb-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  9. 10-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 570/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and discharged accused Sunil Shantaram Patil of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the case's age (over 1 year 4 months) and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunity. Police records were retained for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case