state vs karan padmakar dipake — 548/2025

Case under Maharashtra Police Act Section 33(w). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060008432025

Filing Number

694/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2025

Registration No

548/2025

Registration Date

11-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

202

Police Station

Pen Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Police Act Section 33(w)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.karan padmakar dipake

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Karan Dipke under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged him of offences under Sections 33(w) of the Maharashtra Police Act, citing the accused's non-appearance for 9 months despite multiple efforts and minimal chances of securing his presence. The court ordered disposal of seized property post-appeal period while retaining police records for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  5. 13-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen

  6. 18-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 548/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Karan Dipke under Section 258 of the CrPC and discharged him of offences under Sections 33(w) of the Maharashtra Police Act, citing the accused's non-appearance for 9 months despite multiple efforts and minimal chances of securing his presence. The court ordered disposal of seized property post-appeal period while retaining police records for potential case reopening under Section 300(5) of the CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case