State of Maharashtra vs Chandan Prabhakar Bhagat-3 Advocate - Sandesh Gunjal/Sagar Shinde — 66/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498-A,417,406,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG060006972023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
538/2023
Filing Date
01-06-2023
Registration No
66/2023
Registration Date
01-06-2023
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
Pen Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
Chandan Prabhakar Bhagat-3 Advocate - Sandesh Gunjal/Sagar Shinde
Kausar Shamshul Raheman Shaikh
Farin Shamshul Raheman shaikh
Ashish Govind Kadam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Disposed
Arguments
Compliance
Compliance
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 10-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 06-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all four accused of charges under IPC sections 498(A) (cruelty to wife), 417 (cheating), and 406 (criminal breach of trust). The judge found that the complainant's testimony was inconsistent with her written complaint, and she admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, rendering the prosecution unable to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were discharged and ordered to furnish bail of ₹15,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all four accused of charges under IPC sections 498(A) (cruelty to wife), 417 (cheating), and 406 (criminal breach of trust). The judge found that the complainant's testimony was inconsistent with her written complaint, and she admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, rendering the prosecution unable to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were discharged and ordered to furnish bail of ₹15,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts