State of Maharashtra vs United Cargo Movers — 458/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 239,177. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG060006692025
Filing Number
549/2025
Filing Date
07-May-2025
Registration No
458/2025
Registration Date
07-May-2025
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.United Cargo Movers
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused United Cargo Movers under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for offences under Section 239/177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding that repeated summons failed to secure the accused's presence and no substantive evidence existed on record beyond the initial complaint. The court concluded that continuing proceedings would serve no purpose and cancelled the accused's bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
12-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
13-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
10-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
-
10-May-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 458/2025
The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused United Cargo Movers under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for offences under Section 239/177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, finding that repeated summons failed to secure the accused's presence and no substantive evidence existed on record beyond the initial complaint. The court concluded that continuing proceedings would serve no purpose and cancelled the accused's bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts