Vithoba Mahadev Mhatre vs Pradeep Anant Mhatre Advocate - Manish Mhatre, V.C.Thakur — 69/2017
Case under Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 6(IV)(B)(J). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG060006472017
Next Hearing
23rd July 2026
Filing Number
127/2017
Filing Date
04-08-2017
Registration No
69/2017
Registration Date
04-08-2017
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vithoba Mahadev Mhatre
Adv. Mhatre B. V.
Respondent(s)
Pradeep Anant Mhatre Advocate - Manish Mhatre, V.C.Thakur
Rasika Pradeep Mhatre
Groupgrampanchayat Deev thr.Gramsevak
Namdev Mahadev Mhatre
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Evidence Part Heard
Lok-Nyayalaya
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-04-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 69/2017 The court allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 27/06/2018. The plaintiff, who had possessed a room (25X10 area) in ancestral property since 1987 following parental partition, sought protection after defendants unlawfully entered and allegedly stole articles between May 2-10, 2017. The court found a prima facie case in plaintiff's favor based on property documents and FIR, noting defendants' failure to file written statements. The defendants were restrained from entering the disputed room until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 69/2017 The court allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction on 27/06/2018. The plaintiff, who had possessed a room (25X10 area) in ancestral property since 1987 following parental partition, sought protection after defendants unlawfully entered and allegedly stole articles between May 2-10, 2017. The court found a prima facie case in plaintiff's favor based on property documents and FIR, noting defendants' failure to file written statements. The defendants were restrained from entering the disputed room until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts