State of Maharashtra vs Sambhaji G Mhaskar — 333/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 108,177. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG060005382025
Filing Number
424/2025
Filing Date
05-05-2025
Registration No
333/2025
Registration Date
05-05-2025
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sambhaji G Mhaskar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 19-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 333/2025 Court Decision: The court found respondent Sambhaji G. Mhaskar guilty under Motor Vehicles Act Section 108/177 for violating traffic rules on 06/01/2025. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense, and considering it was his first offense with assurances of future compliance, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with one day imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the respondent's voluntary and spontaneous confession of guilt, combined with his clean record and commitment to reform, warranted conviction under CrPC Section 255(2). The court exercised judicial discretion in imposing a lenient sentence given these mitigating circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 333/2025 Court Decision: The court found respondent Sambhaji G. Mhaskar guilty under Motor Vehicles Act Section 108/177 for violating traffic rules on 06/01/2025. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense, and considering it was his first offense with assurances of future compliance, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with one day imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the respondent's voluntary and spontaneous confession of guilt, combined with his clean record and commitment to reform, warranted conviction under CrPC Section 255(2). The court exercised judicial discretion in imposing a lenient sentence given these mitigating circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts