State of Maharashtra vs Sambhaji G Mhaskar — 333/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 108,177. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 12th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHRG060005382025

Case disposed

Filing Number

424/2025

Filing Date

05-05-2025

Registration No

333/2025

Registration Date

05-05-2025

Court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen

Judge

3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 108,177

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sambhaji G Mhaskar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Jt.Civil Judge J D and J M F C Pen

12-03-2026

Disposed

20-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

19-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

10-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

10-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 333/2025 Court Decision: The court found respondent Sambhaji G. Mhaskar guilty under Motor Vehicles Act Section 108/177 for violating traffic rules on 06/01/2025. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense, and considering it was his first offense with assurances of future compliance, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with one day imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the respondent's voluntary and spontaneous confession of guilt, combined with his clean record and commitment to reform, warranted conviction under CrPC Section 255(2). The court exercised judicial discretion in imposing a lenient sentence given these mitigating circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 333/2025 Court Decision: The court found respondent Sambhaji G. Mhaskar guilty under Motor Vehicles Act Section 108/177 for violating traffic rules on 06/01/2025. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense, and considering it was his first offense with assurances of future compliance, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 500 with one day imprisonment in default of fine payment. Key Reasoning: The court noted that the respondent's voluntary and spontaneous confession of guilt, combined with his clean record and commitment to reform, warranted conviction under CrPC Section 255(2). The court exercised judicial discretion in imposing a lenient sentence given these mitigating circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case