State of Maharashtra vs Govind Devaji Pawar — 253/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG060004742024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
341/2024
Filing Date
16-04-2024
Registration No
253/2024
Registration Date
19-04-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
105
Police Station
Pen Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Govind Devaji Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Disposed
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-12-2025 | Filing of Surety | |
| 20-09-2025 | Filing of Surety | |
| 04-08-2025 | Filing of Surety | |
| 17-06-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused Govind Pawar of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the accused's continuous absence for nearly two years despite prosecution's failed attempts to secure his presence. Seized property will be disposed per law, with case papers retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and discharged accused Govind Pawar of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, citing the accused's continuous absence for nearly two years despite prosecution's failed attempts to secure his presence. Seized property will be disposed per law, with case papers retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts