State of Maharashtra vs Chandar Hadaku Pawar — 249/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHRG060004692024
Filing Number
338/2024
Filing Date
16-Apr-2024
Registration No
249/2024
Registration Date
19-Apr-2024
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
2-Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chandar Hadaku Pawar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Chandar Pawar under section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by stopping proceedings under section 258 of the CrPC, citing the case's 20-month pendency and the prosecution's failure to file the required chemical analysis report despite sufficient opportunity. The seized property will be disposed of per law, with case records retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
09-Dec-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
20-Sep-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
04-Aug-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
16-Jun-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
25-Apr-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
21-Feb-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
04-Dec-2024
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
04-Nov-2024
Filing of Vakilpatra
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
07-Aug-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
11-Jun-2024
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Pen
-
03-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 249/2024
The court discharged accused Chandar Pawar under section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by stopping proceedings under section 258 of the CrPC, citing the case's 20-month pendency and the prosecution's failure to file the required chemical analysis report despite sufficient opportunity. The seized property will be disposed of per law, with case records retained for potential re-opening. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts