Santosh Bama Patil vs Machindranath Krushna Patil Advocate - Phadke S. G. — 43/2018
Case under Maharashtra Court Fees Act Section 6(iv)(j). Status: Steps. Next hearing: 13th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHRG060003992018
Next Hearing
13th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
102/2018
Filing Date
16-04-2018
Registration No
43/2018
Registration Date
16-04-2018
Court
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pen
Judge
2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh Bama Patil
Adv. Mhatre N. N.
Devka Santosh Patil
Respondent(s)
Machindranath Krushna Patil Advocate - Phadke S. G.
Gayna Machindranath Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Civil Judge JD and JMFC Pen
Steps
Steps
Steps
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
Awaiting Report of Commissioner
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 21-01-2026 | Steps | |
| 19-11-2025 | Steps | |
| 15-10-2025 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner | |
| 25-07-2025 | Awaiting Report of Commissioner |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: RE-43/2018 | Court: Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pune | Date: 06-07-2022 The plaintiff's application under Order 26, Rule 9 CPC was allowed. The court appointed a court commissioner to inspect and demarcate the disputed land (Survey No. 15, Part 10, Area 0-4-0 hectares) based on the 2008 survey records, prepare a detailed report with evidence, and submit findings to guide the final decree. The defendant's objection to the application was rejected, and a court requisition letter was issued to the taluka land records office in Pune. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: RE-43/2018 | Court: Civil Judge, J.D. and J.M.F.C., Pune | Date: 06-07-2022 The plaintiff's application under Order 26, Rule 9 CPC was allowed. The court appointed a court commissioner to inspect and demarcate the disputed land (Survey No. 15, Part 10, Area 0-4-0 hectares) based on the 2008 survey records, prepare a detailed report with evidence, and submit findings to guide the final decree. The defendant's objection to the application was rejected, and a court requisition letter was issued to the taluka land records office in Pune. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts